5' Cap (Cap1)
- Translation initiation
- Self/non-self recognition
In vitro transcribed (IVT) RNA is rapidly being adopted as a powerful tool in both research and clinical settings. Incorporating a suite of proprietary technologies, VectorBuilder’s end-to-end platform delivers high-performance RNA and lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) with enhanced delivery and translation, supporting every stage of research, discovery, and development from IVT vector design to full validation.
Innovative Technologies
Proprietary technologies covering IVT backbones, RNA synthesis, purification, and LNP formulation to deliver optimal performance.
Highly Customizable
Wide range of RNA modification options, production scales, and quality control measures for complete experimental flexibility with expert guidance.
End-to-End Solutions
Seamless workflow covering every stage from design and production to full validation, with GMP manufacturing ready for clinical applications.
Partner with VectorBuilder and take your RNA research further
with cutting-edge RNA and LNP solutions.




Explore our collection of high-quality, research-ready premade IVT RNA and LNP-RNA.
IVT RNA has become a powerful platform in genetic medicine, offering safe, flexible, and efficient gene delivery without the risk of genomic integration. Each RNA modality offered at VectorBuilder brings unique advantages: IVT mRNA enables rapid and transient gene expression for personalized use across therapeutic applications including vaccines, protein replacement, CAR-T, and CRISPR; self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) extends expression duration and potency through built-in replication mechanisms, making it a promising platform for next-generation vaccines; and circular RNA (circRNA), with its covalently closed structure, avoids degradation and supports sustained expression for long-term therapeutic effects. Each modality is further detailed below.
The following diagram depicts the fundamental components of mRNA, with each component playing critical roles in regulating gene expression. There are a variety of methods for assembling these components in vitro and VectorBuilder can help assess the best method for achieving optimal expression, yields, and purity for your project. You can also read the Vector Academy article The Basics of mRNA Therapeutics for a more detailed overview of IVT mRNA.
Figure 1. The structure and function of mRNA components.
saRNA is able to replicate itself in the host cell, with this self-amplification capability reliant on the replicase enzyme encoded in its first open reading frame. As illustrated in Figure 2 below, the nonstructural protein (nsP) genes, with sequence derived from Alphavirus, are translated from the saRNA to form a polyprotein replication complex (replicase), which is responsible for RNA replication. Among them, nsP1 functions as the capping enzyme with methyltransferase and guanylyltransferase activities, while nsP2 possesses RNA helicase and triphosphatase activities. Finally, nsP3 mediates protein-protein interactions and nsP4 serves as an RNA-dependent RNA polymerase. The replicase complex synthesizes a full-length negative-sense RNA, acting as a template for downstream RNA replication. Additionally, conserved sequence elements (CSEs) and a subgenomic promoter (SGP) are utilized as 5′ and 3′ UTRs for the transgene, enabling replicase-mediated amplification and transcription of the transgene. Due to the added size of the replicase gene, saRNA is often more difficult to produce in vitro than traditional mRNA. Therefore, it is critical to establish a robust production pipeline to ensure production of consistent high-quality saRNA.

Figure 2. Mechanism of saRNA replication.
VectorBuilder has developed an optimized production platform for the generation of high-yield and high-purity circRNA based on the Group I permuted intron-exon (PIE) self-splicing technology (Figure 3). The generation of circRNA by this mechanism results in minimal impurities and scar sequence. Of note, the translation of circRNA is IRES-dependent. The IRES recruits the ribosome to initiate translation internally on a transcript independent of its 5' end.

Figure 3. Mechanism of circRNA self-splicing and generation in vitro.
Through extensive R&D, VectorBuilder has developed proprietary purification technologies to ensure the market-leading purity of our IVT RNAs:
| Primary Pure | Fast HiPure | HiPure | GMP HiPure | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Schematic | ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
For clinical applications, please check our GMP manufacturing page. |
| Applicable for | mRNA | mRNA & saRNA | mRNA & saRNA | |
| Mechanism | Negatively charged RNA molecules (both polyadenylated and unpolyadenylated) are purified with positively-charged carboxyl magnetic beads. | RNA molecules are purified with spin columns containing oligo(dT)-coated magnetic beads that specifically bind polyadenylated RNA. | RNA molecules are purified with oligo(dT) affinity chromatography that specifically binds polyadenylated RNA. | |
| Recommended use | Early-stage research and development | Delicate in vitro and in vivo experiments | Preclinical studies and scale-up processes | |
| Scale | 0.1 - 250 mg | 0.1 - 2 mg | 1 mg - 1 g |
VectorBuilder offers a full spectrum of QC assays for IVT RNA, as well as LNP-encapsulated RNA and plasmids. Default QC items (marked with √) are always performed while optional QC items are performed depending on individual project needs.
| Attribute | QC Assay | Research-Grade | GMP-Like | GMP-Grade | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity | mRNA sequence | Sanger sequencing | √ | √ | Check our GMP manufacturing page. |
| mRNA length | Denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis | √ | √ | ||
| Capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE) | Optional | √ | |||
| General/physical property | mRNA concentration | UV spectrophotometry | √ | √ | |
| RiboGreen assay | Optional | √ | |||
| Appearance | Visual inspection | Optional | √ | ||
| Potency | Gene expression | In vitro translation followed by Western blot | Optional | Optional | |
| Cell transfection | Optional | Optional | |||
| Safety | Sterility | Bioburden test | Optional | √ | |
| Mycoplasma | Culture method | Optional | √ | ||
| qPCR | Optional | Optional | |||
| Endotoxin | Kinetic chromogenic assay (KCA) | Optional | √ | ||
| Purity | mRNA integrity | Denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis | √ | √ | |
| Capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE) | Optional | √ | |||
| A260/280 | UV spectrophotometry | √ | √ | ||
| Capping efficiency | LC-MS | Optional | √ | ||
| PolyA analysis | LC-MS | Optional | √ | ||
| Residual dsRNA | Dot blot assay | Optional | √ | ||
| Residual plasmid DNA | qPCR | Optional | √ | ||
| Residual protein | NanoOrange assay | Optional | √ | ||
| Residual solvents | Gas chromatography | Optional | Optional | ||
| Circularization efficiency (for circRNA) | Denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis | √ | Optional | ||
| Capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE) | Optional | √ | |||
| Attribute | QC Assay | Research-Grade | GMP-Like | GMP-grade |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Appearance | Visual inspection | √ | √ | Check our GMP manufacturing page. |
| Concentration | RiboGreen assay | √ | √ | |
| Encapsulation efficiency | RiboGreen assay | √ | √ | |
| Particle size | Dynamic light scattering (Zetasizer) | √ | √ | |
| Polydispersity index (PDI) | Dynamic light scattering (Zetasizer) | √ | √ | |
| Surface charge (Zeta potential) | Dynamic light scattering (Zetasizer) | √ | √ | |
| Encapsulated RNA integrity | Capillary gel electrophoresis (CGE) | Optional | √ | |
| Endotoxin | Kinetic chromogenic assay (KCA) | Optional | √ | |
| pH | pH paper | Optional | √ | |
| Sterility | Bioburden test | Optional | √ |

Figure 4. UTR optimization in IVT mRNAs for enhanced translation. Different 5' and 3' UTR combinations were tested regulating Gaussia luciferase expression in vitro. HEK293T cells were seeded on 12-well plates at a density of 2.3x105 cells per well. Cells were transfected with 1 ug of mRNA per well. At 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 96 h post-transfection, Gaussia luciferase activities were measured from cell culture medium.

Figure 5. Incorporation of a miR-122 targeting site into the 3’ UTR reduces liver-specific gene expression. Mice were intravenously injected with 10 ug of LNP-mRNA coding for HiExpressTM Firefly Luciferase, with or without a miR-122 targeting site in the 3’ UTR. Two different configurations with different positions of the miR-122 targeting site were tested (design A + B). 6 hours post-injection mice were sacrificed, organs were dissected, and luminescence was measured. miR-122 is highly and specifically expressed in the liver and the inclusion of the miR-122 targeting site led to reduced luciferase expression in liver tissue.

Figure 6. Codon optimization in IVT mRNAs enhances gene expression both in vitro and in vivo. (A) Expression of HiExpress™ Firefly Luciferase and other luciferase in HEK293T cells from IVT mRNAs. Cells grown on a 12-well plate were transfected with 0.5 ug of mRNA per well and luciferase activity was measured at 6 h, 24 h, 48 h, and 72 h post-transfection. (B) Luciferase activity measured in adult C57BL/6 mice injected intramuscularly with 30 ug of LNP-mRNA at 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-injection. FLuc WT indicates wild-type firefly luciferase. FLuc WT (co) indicates codon-optimized wild-type firefly luciferase. FLuc2 indicates Luc2 firefly luciferase.

Figure 7. PolyA tail size analysis. PolyA tails were cleaved from IVT mRNA using ribonuclease T1 and isolated by oligo dT affinity chromatography. (A) Isolated polyA tails analyzed by Urea-PAGE gel electrophoresis. (B) Isolated polyA tails analyzed by LC-MS. Deconvoluted spectrum was generated from 120 pmol of polyA tails with an expected size of 120 nt. (C) Size distribution of polyA tails with an expected size of 120 nt. Error bars represent standard deviation from triplicates. Weighted average length is 123 nt.

Figure 8. The influence of polyA length and structure on translational efficiency. HEK293T cells were transfected with IVT EGFP mRNA with the same Cap1 and UTRs but different polyA tail lengths as listed above.

Figure 9. Modified nucleotides increase gene expression and decrease dsRNA impurities. (A) Expression of firefly luciferase in HEK293T cells. mRNA was generated with or without modified nucleotides, N1-Methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ) and 5-Methylcytosine (m5C). Cells were grown on 12-well plates and transfected with 1 ug of mRNA per well. Luciferase activities in HEK293T cells at 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-transfection were measured. Error bars indicate standard deviations. (B) Equal amounts (750 ng per dot) of magnetic bead-purified EGFP IVT mRNA with or without nucleotide modification (m1Ψ) was assessed by dot blot assay for dsRNA impurities.

Figure 10. Denaturing agarose gel result indicating high integrity IVT RNA >10,000 nt.

Figure 11. IVT mRNA capping efficiency analyzed by LC-MS. Highly efficient capping can be achieved either using (A) co-transcriptional or (B) enzymatic approaches.
Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) is a by-product of IVT and a major trigger of undesired immunogenicity. The dot blot result demonstrates that extra purification steps (e.g. IP-PR) may be necessary to achieve an ultra-purification scale with very low levels of dsRNA.

Figure 12. dsRNA removal efficiency of different purification processes. Equal amounts (1500 ng per dot) of hSpCas9 IVT mRNA purified by different processes was assessed by dot blot assay to estimate dsRNA impurities. Abbreviations: HIC, Hydrophobic interaction chromatography; IP-RP, Ion-pair reversed-phase liquid chromatography.

Figure 13. Gel electrophoresis analysis of precursor and circular EGFP RNA (circRNA-EGFP) after incubation with varying concentrations of RNase A as indicated above. RNase A will digest all linear but not circular RNA.

Figure 14. Cryo-TEM micrographs of LNP-mRNA. Scale bar=100 nm.

Figure 15. Particle size and Zeta potential distribution analysis. PDI (A) and Zeta potential (B) were determined by DLS which measures the intensity differences of fluctuated light due to motion of particles. Data demonstrates homogeneous LNP mixtures.

Figure 16. Long-term (153 days) cryopreservation of anti-CD31 antibody-conjugated LNP-mRNA. (A) Firefly luciferase (FLuc)-expressing LNP-encapsulated mRNA was preserved under two conditions: 4 °C with no additives, and -80 °C in 7.5% sucrose solution. Particle size (pink bars) and PDI (teal dots) of both groups were compared to the original parameters. (B) Imaging of Fluc mRNA expression 6 hours post-injection. Female ICR mice were intravenously injected with PBS, LNPs preserved at 4 °C without additives, or LNPs preserved at -80 °C in 7.5% sucrose solution. (C) Encapsulation efficiency of LNP-mRNA after cryopreservation. Freshly prepared FLuc LNP-mRNA was used as the control. (D) Comparison of RNA integrity after cryopreservation. Overall, our data show that storing antibody-conjugated LNP-mRNA at -80 °C in 7.5% sucrose solution effectively maintains particle homogeneity, encapsulation efficiency, and mRNA expression for long-term preservation.

Figure 17. In vivo expression of luciferase (Luc) and antigens using LNP-encapsulated mRNAs. (A) Luciferase activity visualized by live imaging at 6 h, 24 h, and 48 h post-injection. (B) Two pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-6 and TNF-⍺, were quantified in the serum at 48 h post-injection. Error bars represent standard errors. Mice strain: C57BL/6J; mice age: 8 weeks; injection method: intramuscular injection. (C) IFN-γ ELISpot assay of splenocytes derived from Balb/C mice 14 days post intramuscular injection of 30 ug LNP-encapsulated mRNA coding for viral antigen A, viral antigen B, or control PBS.

Figure 18. Efficient mRNA delivery in vitro using LNPs. Cells were transfected with LNP encapsulated EGFP mRNA or EGFP mRNA mixed with commercial transfection reagent. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of EGFP expression in Jurkat and HEK293T cells and (B) Fluorescent imaging of HEK293T cells at 24 hours post-transfection. MFI: median fluorescence intensity.
Figure 19. saRNA exhibits prolonged in vivo translation compared to standard mRNA. Expression of firefly luciferase (Fluc) from 30 µg of LNP-encapsulated mRNA was compared to 10 µg of its saRNA counterpart. While Fluc expression from the traditional mRNA was no longer detectable after 48 hours, saRNA expression persisted for up to 8 days following intramuscular injection.
Figure 20. Comparison of EGFP expression in HEK293T cells after transfection with saRNA or traditional mRNA.
Figure 21. circRNA encoding EGFP was transfected into HEK293T cells and exhibited long-term expression compared to traditional mRNA and non-treated control (NC). Exposure: 100 ms. Magnification: 100x.
| mRNA | circRNA | saRNA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Structure | Linear; usually contains 5’ cap, 5’ UTR, ORF for GOI, 3’ UTR, and poly(A) tail | Circular; usually contains IRES and ORF for GOI | Linear; usually contains 5’ UTR, ORFs for replicase genes and GOI, 3’ UTR, and poly(A) tail |
| Cap | Requires 5’ Cap for stability and ribosome recruitment | No Cap; relies on IRES for ribosome recruitment | Requires 5’ Cap for stability and ribosome recruitment |
| RNA length (nt) | 100 ~ 12,000 | 1000 ~ 5000 | 7000 ~ 12,000 |
| Stability | Low | High | Low |
| Can modified nucleotides be added in production? | Yes | No | Yes |
| Expression level | Low | Medium | High |
| Expression duration | Short | Medium | Long |
| Immunogenicity | Low | Medium | High |
Cap 0 refers to N7-methylguanosine (m7G) that is added to the 5’ end of eukaryotic mRNAs via a 5’ to 5’ triphosphate linkage. This modification is added via a series of enzymatic reactions that occur co-transcriptionally and functions to regulate nuclear export, transcript stability, and promotes translation of the mRNA through recognition by eukaryotic translation initiation factor (eIF4E). Cap 1 refers to the addition of a methyl group to the 2’O on the first nucleotide (m7GpppNm) of the transcribed mRNA sequence in addition to the m7G cap. In mammalian cells, cap 1 structure is an important marker for mRNA to be recognized as self and not targeted by innate immunity. Adding cap 1 structure to synthesized mRNA has been demonstrated to enhance mRNA expression in vivo and reduce its immunogenicity.
Capping for in vitro transcribed RNA can occur either co-transcriptionally with cap analogs or post-transcriptionally via enzymatic reactions. We offer both capping methods, and the efficiency of them has been well validated using LC-MS. Depending on the client-preferred capping method, we will choose a compatible backbone for cloning the IVT mRNA vector from the beginning.
Cells contain cytosolic and endosomal RNA receptors that activate the immune response upon recognition of foreign RNA. Modified nucleotides are commonly found in endogenous cellular RNA. Incorporating certain modified nucleotides in IVT mRNA reduces its immunogenicity, alters secondary structure, and increases translation efficiency and half-life in a sequence-dependent manner. We provide a wide range of modified nucleotides, including the commonly used N1-Methylpseudouridine (m1Ψ) and 5-Methylcytosine (m5C). N1-Methylpsuedouridine and 5-Methylcytosine are naturally occurring nucleotides that were first identified in tRNAs, however, their use in coding mRNAs has only recently been appreciated. These methylated derivatives of uridine and cytosine can replace their canonical nucleotides in mRNA IVT and translation without altering traditional Watson-Crick base pairing. A major advantage to their use in mRNA therapeutics is their ability to alter recognition by RNA immune receptors thus mitigating unwanted immune effects and enhancing transcript stability and translation.