AAV Capsid Evolution

Recombinant adeno-associated virus (AAV) is widely used for gene therapies and vaccines due to its broad tropism, prolonged transgene expression, and low immunogenicity. However, existing serotypes have limitations, including insufficient tissue specificity, low delivery efficiency with potential off-target transduction, pre-existing neutralizing antibodies, and manufacturing challenges. Our capsid engineering platform ensures the most effective and efficient development of novel AAV variants with enhanced properties for your therapeutic development goals.

Highlights

Full Service Platform
The world’s only one-stop solution for all AAV preclinical and clinical needs, from vector design through GMP manufacturing.

Optimized Library Design
Our expertise allows us to design libraries with optimal complexity and custom-build diverse capsid libraries using versatile approaches.

High-Quality Library Packaging
We leverage our proprietary packaging platform to achieve high titers with each viral particle carrying its matching capsid variant.

Powerful Screening Capability
Robust in vitro and in vivo screening, including mouse, rat, and NHP studies conducted in AAALAC-accredited facilities.

Service Details and Technical Information

Construction and screening of AAV capsid libraries allows for the identification of candidates with high therapeutic potential for 1) efficient transduction of target cells within specific tissues or organs, 2) binding of cell type-specific receptors with high affinity, or 3) evasion of neutralizing antibodies. A typical workflow of AAV capsid evolution is shown below:

Capsid variant
generation
Capsid library construction
Virus
packaging
Capsid screening in vitro
and in vivo
Validation of novel capsid

Below are common strategies for creating diverse AAV capsid variants. The capsid library is then constructed by massively parallel cloning of the variants into AAV vectors, forming chimeric AAV genomes, each containing a rep gene and a capsid gene variant.

Random peptide display
Error-prone PCR
DNA family shuffling
In silico design

Random peptide display

Random peptide display involves the insertion of random peptide sequences of usually 7 to 9 amino acids into specific sites of the AAV capsid, aiming to alter the natural cellular interactions of the virus and retarget it to specific cell receptors. Peptides are typically inserted at locations of the AAV capsid that facilitate surface exposure of the peptide and are critical for virus-host interactions. For example, between positions 587 and 588 (within the variable region VRIII) of the AAV2 capsid is a preferred insertion site for most AAV2-based peptide display libraries, as peptide insertion here abolishes the heparan sulfate proteoglycan (HSPG, the primary AAV2 receptor) motif of AAV2 and enables the displayed peptides to interact efficiently with cell surface molecules.

Error-prone PCR

Error-prone PCR is the most straightforward approach for developing highly variable AAV capsid libraries, which involves the modification of standard PCR methods to mutagenize the AAV capsid gene. More specifically, error-prone PCR employs a combination of various sub-optimal PCR conditions, including low-fidelity polymerases, longer extension times, higher Mg2+ concentrations, addition of Mn2+, and varying dNTP concentrations for introducing random point mutations into the AAV capsid gene.

DNA family shuffling

DNA family shuffling is a highly efficient approach for generating chimeric AAV capsids by molecular interbreeding of parental capsid genes derived from different AAV serotypes. To accomplish this, the parental capsid genes of various AAV serotypes are fragmented, followed by their reassembly into novel full-length capsid variants by primer-less PCR, which recombines them based on partial sequence homology. As an alternative strategy, high complexity libraries can also be created by synthetic shuffling, which combines rational design (modifying the capsid based on prior knowledge of AAV biology) with directed evolution. In this approach, capsid locations suitable for mutagenesis are first identified and evaluated based on a detailed structural and sequence analysis of naturally occurring AAV serotypes. Fragments containing mutations are synthesized and assembled to form full-length novel capsid variants.

In silico design

In silico design of AAV capsid libraries utilizes a variety of approaches for computational prediction of capsid variant sequences with the potential to contribute to enhanced AAV performance. One commonly used approach is ancestral reconstruction, which involves in silico design of a putative ancestral AAV library followed by its experimental validation to identify highly potent ancestral capsid sequences with improved tropism. The rationale behind this approach is that evolutionary AAV intermediates that emerged by surviving the process of natural selection are highly likely to possess unique properties while maintaining virus structure and function. Machine learning is another commonly used in silico design approach that applies computational algorithms to predict the chances of viable virus production from hypothetical capsid variants. Machine learning algorithms heavily rely on available input data to learn structure-function relationships of proteins and apply that to predict the outcome of complex physiological processes such as viral capsid assembly.

Virus packaging of the capsid library can be accomplished by either one- or two-step process, as described below:

One-step packaging of the capsid library
Two-step packaging of the capsid library

The conventional approach for packaging AAV capsid libraries utilizes a one-step process in which packaging cells are co-transfected with the capsid library and an adenoviral helper plasmid. While widely used, this method has drawbacks, including cross-packaging (generation of AAV particles with mismatched capsid variant genome and capsid) and capsid mosaicism (generation of AAV particles with mosaic capsids arising from capsid proteins derived from different genomes). To overcome these challenges, it is recommended that the packaging cells be transfected at a very low plasmid library-to-cell ratio to ensure uptake of no more than one library plasmid per cell.

In a two-step packaging approach, the capsid library is first co-transfected into packaging cells along with a helper plasmid encoding the WT capsid gene but lacking the viral ITRs. This produces AAV particles with mosaic capsids partially composed of the WT capsid, referred to as AAV transfer shuttles. These AAV transfer shuttles are then introduced into packaging cells at a low MOI for achieving at most one viral particle per cell, followed by superinfection of the packaging cells with adenovirus, which ultimately results in the generation of high-titer viral capsid libraries.

The viral capsid library is usually subjected to several rounds of screening in vitro or in vivo, depending on the purpose of screening, to select chimeric AAVs with desirable properties:

In vitro selection
In vivo selection

Utilizing established cell lines for AAV capsid library screening is a widely used approach, particularly for identifying AAV variants with altered receptor targeting abilities. Although in vitro selection is fast and technically simple, it presents some challenges. First, vectors optimized for high transduction efficiency in vitro may not be able to recapitulate the same efficiency when used in vivo. Second, AAV vectors demonstrating high target cell specificity in vitro might transduce non-target tissues in vivo. Another in vitro selection strategy of AAV libraries involves subjecting the library to potent serum from immunized animals prior to adding it to target cells, specifically for identifying variants with immune-evasive properties. However, the immune response of AAV variants may vary when translated in vivo due to various factors (e.g. immune recognition of the same AAV vector may differ when delivered via different routes).

In vivo animal models offer a more reliable platform for screening AAV libraries, particularly for identifying AAV variants capable of transducing delicate cell types that cannot be grown in culture or AAV variants capable of transducing a specific cell type within complex tissue structures. In vivo selection also helps reveal potential off-target effects associated with an AAV variant. While both mouse and NHPs are widely used for in vivo screening of AAV libraries, NHP models represent the most clinically relevant platform for screening improved AAV vectors due to their high degree of similarity to humans.

Your novel AAV capsid will be thoroughly characterized and validated for its desired properties. This may include, for example, AAV biodistribution profiling across multiple species to assess tissue tropism, transduction efficiency, and potential off-target effects. We can also perform concurrent optimizations on both AAV transfer vectors and packaging vectors for the greatest potential in therapeutic development using our CliniVec™ consultation service. 

Experimental Data

High-quality plasmid library construction

Figure 1. Nucleotide composition of an (NNK)11 peptide display AAV capsid plasmid library. The library was constructed using the NNK degenerated codon strategy. Each bar represents a distinct nucleotide position along the DNA sequence, with colors indicating the observed nucleotides. All positions exhibited anticipated nucleotides with observed frequencies close to theoretical values (N = 25% A + 25% T + 25% G + 25% C, K = 50% T + 50% G).

Figure 2. Distribution of amino acids in the 7-mer variable region of a peptide display AAV capsid plasmid library. The library was constructed using the NNK degenerate codon strategy. Each bar represents the theoretical (teal) or actual (pink) percentage of specific amino acids or the stop codon. The observed frequencies of all 20 amino acids and the stop codon closely matched the theoretical frequencies.

Reliable platform for capsid library packaging

Figure 3. Comparison of viral packaging reproducibility between two technical replicates of the same AAV capsid library using different platforms (Left: VB proprietary; Right: conventional). Strong correlation was observed between replicates when using the VB proprietary platform (r = 0.70), indicating high reproducibility. In contrast, the conventional packaging method showed poor correlation (r = 0.02), potentially due to stochastic events that occurred during packaging that reduced efficiency.

Robust reproducibility of in vivo screens

Figure 4. Strong correlation of in vivo AAV capsid library screening readouts across animals. (A) The AAV capsid library was injected subretinally, followed by RNA-seq. Read counts of variants in the retinas of different mice were compared, showing a strong correlation (r = 0.88). (B) The AAV capsid library was delivered via intravenous tail vein injection, followed by DNA-seq. Read counts in the livers of different mice were compared, demonstrating a strong correlation (r = 0.93). These results show that our in vivo screening platform is highly reliable for the discovery of novel AAV capsids.

VectorBuilder's Precision Capsids

VectorBuilder’s innovative capsid technology provides a powerful solution: engineered capsids with enhanced targeting specificity and maximum gene delivery performance, enabling safer, more effective, and more efficient AAV-based therapeutics.

Brain

Optimized for maximum efficiency and streamlined delivery across the blood-brain barrier.

Highlights
  • Delivery via systemic injection
  • Efficiently penetrates blood-brain barrier
  • Validated in BALB/c and C57BL/6 mouse models
  • Substantially reduced off-target expression in liver
Ocular

Our ocular capsid boasts excellent pan-retinal penetration and peripheral spread, with superior transduction efficiency in the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).

Highlights
  • Delivery via intravitreal injection
  • Exceptional penetration and efficiency across all retinal layers, especially in RPE
  • Validated in non-human primates (NHPs)
Muscular

VectorBuilder’s novel capsids significantly enhance targeting and efficiency to skeletal, cardiac, and diaphragm muscles.

Highlights
  • Delivery via systemic injection
  • Improved transduction efficiency in muscle
  • Minimized off-target expression

Resources

FAQ
How do different AAV capsid library construction methods compare?
Method Description Advantages Limitations
Random Peptide Display Insertion of random peptide sequences of usually 7 to 9 amino acids into specific sites of the AAV capsid.
  • Simplicity in implementation
  • Discovery of novel functionalities
Potential immunogenicity concerns
Error-Prone PCR Employs sub-optimal PCR conditions to introduce random point mutations into the AAV capsid gene. Straightforward approach for developing highly variable AAV capsid libraries Likelihood of functional diversity is low
DNA Family Shuffling Genetic material from related AAV serotypes is shuffled to create chimeric capsids.
  • Exploits natural diversity in AAV family
  • Higher likelihood of functional diversity
  • Labor-intensive and time-consuming
  • Requires knowledge of AAV family relationships
In Silico Design Computational methods used to predict and design AAV capsid variants.
  • Precision in targeting specific functionalities
  • Time and cost-effective in silico screening
  • Limited accuracy of predictions
  • Dependency on accurate structural data
What are the pros and cons of using RNA-seq versus DNA-seq as the readout for AAV capsid screening?
RNA-seq DNA-seq
Advantages
  • No artifact signal from extracellular AAV
  • High sensitivity due to signal amplification of DNA-to-RNA transcription
  • Less tissue requirement
  • Precise mRNA retrieval from target tissue when using a tissue-specific promoter
  • Direct output of successful cellular entry of viral particles
  • Independent of transgene promoter activity in the target tissue
Limitations
  • More steps in NGS library preparation
  • Not suitable if the transgene promoter is inactive in the target tissue
  • Potential signal contamination from extracellular AAV
  • Lower sensitivity