Inducible Gene Expression Solutions

VectorBuilder offers comprehensive services for temporal regulation of your target genes. We provide ready-to-use reagents including plasmids, viruses, inducible stable cell lines, and more, ideal for meeting a wide variety of experimental needs.

Highlights

Online vector design studio

Customizable: Our free, highly intuitive online vector design studio enables unlimited customization of your inducible vectors.

Comprehensive

Comprehensive: Wide variety of inducible systems, including Tet-On and Tet-Off vectors available in all-in-one and dual vector formats.

Streamlined

Streamlined: Full service from experimental design through stable cell line engineering and beyond.

Integrated Technical Expertise

Expertise: Excellent quality, fast turnaround, and competitive pricing with powerful technical support.

What We Offer

VectorBuilder offers premium-quality virus packaging services for delivering Tet-inducible gene expression systems into difficult-to-transfect cells. Our proprietary technologies in virus packaging ensure improved titer, purity, viability, and consistency.

Streamline your research with VectorBuilder's fully

customizable Tet-inducible expression systems

Contact Us

Technical Information

Tet system overview
Tet system vector types
Tet system delivery approaches
Other inducible systems
Tetracycline-inducible gene expression

The tetracycline (Tet) inducible expression system allows precise temporal control of expression of your gene of interest (GOI), shRNA, or other ORF in target cells. This system is especially useful when studying toxic genes, genes whose expression must be tightly regulated for normal cellular function, or genes that are otherwise not well-tolerated by the cell. In Tet-inducible systems, the ORF is placed under the control of a Tet-responsive promoter (Tet-responsive element, or TRE). Binding of Tet regulatory proteins to this promoter, and therefore expression of the ORF, is controlled by the presence or absence of tetracycline or its analogs, resulting in reversible and dose-dependent regulation of gene expression, as illustrated in Figure 1. Tetracycline analogs such as doxycycline (dox) are commonly used as inducers due to their stability and potency. Tetracycline and its analogs can be used to either turn gene expression on (Tet-On) or off (Tet-off). 

Tet-On vector systems (Figure 1, left) are designed to exhibit strong silencing of an ORF in the absence of tetracycline and strong expression in response to the addition of tetracycline. This is achieved through a multicomponent system that incorporates the tetracycline-controlled transcriptional silencer (tTS) and the reverse tetracycline transactivator (rtTA). In the absence of tetracycline, the tTS protein derived from the fusion of TetR (Tet repressor protein) and KRAB-AB (transcriptional repressor domain of Kid-1 protein) binds to the TRE promoter, leading to the active suppression of ORF transcription. The rtTA protein, on the other hand, derived from the fusion of rTetR (a mutant Tet repressor) and VP16 (transcriptional activator domain of virion protein 16 of HSV), binds to the TRE promoter to activate gene transcription only in the presence of tetracycline. Unlike Tet-On systems relying only on rtTA, which usually have significant leaky expression without induction, our Tet-On vector system expressing tTS/rtTA acts as a true tetracycline-regulated on-and-off switch for controlling gene expression, minimizing background expression without induction and ensuring robust, dynamic, and scalable induction by tetracycline (Figure 2).

The Tet-Off vector system (Figure 1, right) inhibits target gene expression in the presence of tetracycline. In the absence of tetracycline, tetracycline-controlled transactivator (tTA) binds to the TRE promoter resulting in transcriptional activation. When tetracycline is added, it binds to tTA, resulting in a conformational change that prevents tTA from binding to TRE and causes transcriptional repression.

Using Tet-on and Tet-off systems to inhibit/activate target genes via applying doxycycline.

Figure 1. Mechanisms of Tet-regulated gene expression in Tet-On and Tet-Off systems. Dox: tetracycline analog doxycycline.

All-in-one vs. dual vector

To achieve Tet-regulated induction or inhibition of your ORF, it is essential for the target cells to co-express the ORF driven by the TRE promoter and the Tet regulatory proteins (tTS and rtTA or tTA) at the same time. This can be accomplished by either expressing both the ORF and the Tet regulatory protein(s) from the same vector (using an all-in-one vector) or by using separate vectors: one expressing the ORF driven by TRE and one expressing Tet regulatory protein(s) (dual vectors). All-in-one vectors provide a system that is technically straightforward and ideal for difficult-to-transfect cells. Conversely, using separate vectors to co-express the ORF and the Tet regulatory proteins requires co-transfection or co-transduction of the target cells with two separate plasmids or viruses, which can be technically challenging. An alternative approach to using dual vectors is to first create cells or organisms stably expressing the Tet regulatory proteins, then introduce a vector expressing the ORF. However, this method can be considerably time consuming and labor intensive. Despite its challenges, the dual vector system is sometimes preferred since it offers the flexibility of using the same Tet regulatory protein expressing plasmid, virus, or cell line with multiple different overexpression constructs.

Tissue-specific Tet-inducible gene expression vector

VectorBuilder offers non-viral all-in-one (Tet-On) vectors in two formats, standard and low-leak, to help you achieve effective induction of your GOI, particularly when requiring tissue-specific induction. While the standard Tet-On vector system expresses tTS and rtTA as a fusion protein driven by a user-selected promoter, the low-leak Tet-On vector system utilizes a ubiquitous promoter to drive tTS expression and a user-selected (e.g. tissue-specific) promoter to drive rtTA expression. By repressing GOI expression in all transduced cells while restricting activator expression to only target cells, the low-leak Tet-On design minimizes expression in non-target tissues in both the presence and absence of tetracycline and ensures robust, specific activation in target tissues when tetracycline is present.

One of the key factors underlying the design of any successful gene delivery experiment is the choice of the vector system used for delivering the components for Tet-inducible expression into target cells. Given the variety of viral and non-viral vector options available, it is important to consider several factors when choosing the ideal delivery system, such as the ease of transfection of the target cells, whether transient expression or stable genomic integration is desired, the intended application in cell culture or in vivo, and the size of the ORF and other components.

The table below lists the commonly used vector systems and key considerations for selecting the system most suitable for your experimental design.

Regular plasmid vectors Viral vectors Transposon vectors
Transfection-based Yes No Yes
Transient expression or stable integration Transient Stable integration Stable integration
Requires packaging No Yes No
Cargo capacity Large Small to medium Medium to large
Primary use Cell culture Cell culture & In vivo Cell culture & in vivo
Promoter customization Yes Depending on viral vector type Yes
IPTG-inducible systems

In addition to the Tet system, the IPTG (isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactoside) inducible system is another widely used method for temporally-controlled gene expression. The IPTG-inducible vector utilizes the interaction between LacI (repressor) protein and LacO operator sequence, derived from the bacterial lactose operon to regulate gene expression in the presence or absence of the lactose analogue, IPTG.

In this system, one or more operator sequences (LacO) are present either within or adjacent to the ORF promoter. In the absence of IPTG, the LacI protein binds to the operator sequence and blocks RNA polymerase from initiating transcription. When IPTG is present, it binds to LacI and causes a conformational change, releasing it from the operator region. This removal of repression allows RNA polymerase to initiate transcription of the target gene, enabling tight regulation of gene expression by minimizing background promoter activity in the absence of IPTG.

Other inducible systems

Beyond Tet and IPTG, several other methods including drug-inducible systems, RNA-based switches, and physical stimulants can be used for inducible gene expression. In drug-inducible systems, transcriptional activity is typically controlled by a ligand-binding domain/receptor fused to a regulatory protein, to provide tight control of GOI expression only in the presence of the ligand; for example, estrogen receptor- or glucocorticoid receptor-based systems can be activated by tamoxifen or glucocorticoids such as dexamethasone, respectively. Drug-inducible systems are often combined with conditional expression systems to provide tight temporal and spatial control, for instance using CreERT2. Alternatively, riboswitches are RNA-based, cis-acting regulatory elements that control gene expression at the RNA level upon binding to a ligand, while physical induction systems use external stimuli like light or oxygen levels (e.g. using hypoxia responsive elements) or temperature shifts (using heat shock protein promoters) associated with transcriptional regulatory elements to turn ORF expression on or off.

The Tet-inducible gene expression system has gained popularity over other available inducible gene expression systems since it offers several advantages, as summarized in the table below:

Tet-inducible gene expression system Other inducible gene expression systems
Regulation Minimized leaky expression in the absence of tetracycline. High levels of leaky expression in the absence of inducer due to basal transgene expression. E.g. Tamoxifen-based system, riboswitch-based system.
Gene induction level Achieves rapid and high levels (1000-fold) of target gene induction in the presence of tetracycline. Achieves much lower levels (100-fold) of target gene induction. E.g. Tamoxifen-based system, riboswitch-based system.
Reversibility Can achieve reversible gene expression by the addition and removal of tetracycline. Results in irreversible activation of gene expression. E.g. Cre-ERT system.
Toxicity High level induction can be achieved with non-toxic levels of doxycycline. Exhibits increased cellular toxicity. E.g. Tamoxifen-based system.
Cost-effective Requires tetracycline or one of its derivatives such as doxycycline which are cheap and easily available. Requires inducers which are more expensive. E.g. hormone-based systems.
Pleiotropic effects Minimized pleiotropic effects due to the absence of prokaryotic regulatory sequences in mammalian cells. Increased pleiotropic effects due to activation of non-target endogenous genes. E.g. Ecdysone-based system, CID-based system.

Visit Vector Academy for educational resources to help you successfully plan, execute, and troubleshoot your Tet-inducible gene expression experiments. Additionally, you can find helpful guides on Tet-inducible vector systems here and Tet-inducible vector components here.

Case Studies

rtTA vs tTS/rtTA systems
Inducible shRNA systems

Comparison of all-in-one (Tet-On) vectors: rtTA vs tTS/rtTA

- Dox + Dox rtTA tTS/rtTA Tet-on vector system expressing tTs/rtTA have a higher range of Tet induction comparing the system relying on rtTA only.

Figure 2. EGFP expression in 293T cells transfected with either an all-in-one (Tet-On) regular plasmid vector expressing EGFP and rtTA (Top) or EGFP and tTS/rtTA (Bottom). EGFP expression was assessed both in the absence (-Dox) and presence (+Dox) of doxycycline 48 hours post-transfection.

Inducible shRNA systems provide tightly regulated, temporally-controlled knockdown of target genes in a wide variety of mammalian cells. These shRNAs can be controlled by either tetracycline-based mechanisms or IPTG-based mechanisms.

Resources

FAQ
Should I use a rtTA only or a tTS/rtTA Tet-On vector system?

Unlike Tet-On systems relying only on rtTA that usually have significant leaky expression without induction, our Tet-On vector system expressing tTS/rtTA acts as a true tetracycline-regulated on-and-off switch for controlling gene expression, which can minimize background expression without induction and result in high sensitivity and high dynamic range of tetracycline induction (Figure 2). In the absence of tetracycline, the tTS protein binds to the TRE promoter leading to active suppression of gene transcription and thereby, minimizing background expression. The rtTA protein, on the other hand, binds to the TRE promoter to activate gene transcription only in the presence of tetracycline.

If using lentivirus for delivering Tet system components, should I use all-in-one or dual vector design?

When delivering Tet system components into target cells using lentivirus, we generally do not recommend all-in-one vector design. Based on our internal data and customer feedback, the gene induction efficiency using all-in-one lentiviral vectors is context-dependent and often not optimal. All-in-one vectors usually contain two gene expression cassettes: the GOI driven by the TRE promoter and the Tet regulatory protein (e.g., tTA, tTS, and/or rtTA) expression cassette. This design can be problematic because the requirements for efficient virus packaging can conflict with the need for independent expression of each cassette. An internal polyadenylation signal placed between the two LTRs of the lentiviral vector would interrupt virus packaging. As a result, transcription from the upstream promoter does not stop at the end of the upstream ORF and continues to pass through the downstream promoter(s) and ORF(s), which often leads to partial inhibition of expression of the downstream ORF(s). In an all-in-one lentiviral vector, since Tet regulatory proteins are placed downstream of the GOI, their expression can be reduced significantly, leading to leaky expression and inefficient induction as illustrated in Figure 5.

- Dox+ Dox

Dual
All-in-one
Dual (Tet-on) lentivirus showed effective induction compared with all-in-one (Tet-on) lentivirus.

Figure 5. EGFP expression in 293T cells transduced with either dual Tet-On lentivirus (Top) or all-in-one Tet-On lentivirus (Bottom). For dual vector-based induction, 293T cells stably expressing tTS/rtTA were transduced with lentivirus expressing TRE-driven EGFP. EGFP expression was checked both in the absence (-Dox) and presence (+Dox) of doxycycline 48 hours post-transduction.

Featured Citations
Design My Vector Request Design Support